Cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) is accomplished by “cardio” exercises like
running, stair climbing, bicycle riding, etc. It has been shown to provide
benefits for several chronic diseases.
One recent study examined how cardiorespiratory fitness might help protect
men from cancer and from death due to cancer. The study followed 13,949
midlife men for 38 years. Researchers found “an inverse association between
midlife CRF and incident lung and colorectal cancer but not prostate
cancer.” This means that the higher their cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF),
the lower their likelihood of getting lung or colorectal cancer.
In addition, “high midlife CRF is associated with lower risk of
cause-specific mortality in those diagnosed as having cancer at Medicare
age.” Again, those with higher cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) in midlife,
the lower their chance of dying of cancer when they are older.
More reasons to get off the couch and get your heart and lungs pumping.
More Harm than Good?
You go in to see your doctor who confirms your suspicion, you need
care for some kind of ailment. It may be a drug, surgery or
something else. In the course of your conversation, you hear how the
care (also known as an “intervention”) will address your ailment and
ultimately improve your health. You develop certain expectations
based primarily on your conversation with your doctor.
But are your expectations accurate?
A new study has determined that there is a good chance they aren’t.
Researchers found that “the majority of participants (patients)
overestimated intervention benefit and underestimated harm.
Clinicians should discuss accurate and balanced information about
intervention benefits and harms with patients, providing the
opportunity to develop realistic expectations and make informed
decisions.”
Next time you are told you need to take a drug, have surgery, etc.
Be courageous enough to ask the hard questions. Get the truth about
the potential benefits and potential harm. Make your own informed
decisions.
Read the abstract
---------------------------
From grassrootshealth.net about
preventing rickets in infants with
decent
vitamin D intake
Three prevalent positions spell trouble for infants
With the resurgence of breast feeding, more babies are off infant
formula and are not getting vitamin D supplementation. This would be
fine if the mother had a daily vitamin D intake (through sun exposure,
food, or supplements) that resulted in 25(OH)D concentration of 40 ng/ml
or higher. But most doctors do not know to tell breast feeding mothers
this information, nor do they prescribe vitamin D supplementation to
infants. In fact,
·
the normal population has a vitamin D blood level of about 25 ng/ml
(NHANES)
·
AND... doctors are not recommending supplementation for infants or their
mothers
·
AND.... doctors are recommending that mothers and their infants stay out
of the sun, cover up, or use sunscreen
The result is that most mothers and their babies are not getting
enough vitamin D and rickets is re-emerging.
Lack of vitamin D supplementation in infants
Our panel of scientists recommend infants (< 1 year) take 400 IU vitamin
D daily starting a few days after delivery. The easiest way for an
infant to receive supplementation is by using drops (Google: 'vitamin D
drops').
Carol
Wagner, MD studied
vitamin D in infants and
found that with 400
IU/day
the mean vitamin D level in her study group increased from 16 ng/ml (at
1 month) to 43 ng/ml (at 4 months) and 42 ng/ml (at 7 months)
How to get vitamin D in breast milk
Another way to provide vitamin D for an infant is to ensure that there
is enough vitamin D in the breast milk. This is possible and has been
demonstrated by Dr. Wagner. Wagner ran a lactation study that found
women who are replete in vitamin D (> 40 ng/ml) can transfer vitamin D
to their babies. She found that 6400 IU/day was necessary for the women
to stay replete in vitamin D and that this would be equivalent to babies
getting a 400 IU/day supplement.
Wagner's presentation on Vitamin
D and Public Health: Integrating sunshine, supplement, and measurement
for optimal health includes information from this lactation study
(minutes 34:30 -> end).
In his
blog Vitamin
D and the nursing mother ,
Dr.
Robert Heaney ends
with a
call to action that all mothers supplement with 5,000 - 6,000 IU/daily
because doing so would provide the needed benefit for both the mother
and baby, naturally. He also makes a very important point that
supplementation needs to be daily:
"There is one important proviso for nursing mothers concerning the
needed intake. Those who live in North America and have to rely on
supplements should be certain that they take their supplements every
day. While for other purposes it is possible to take vitamin D
intermittently (e.g., once a week), that doesn't work for putting
vitamin D into human milk. The residence time of vitamin D in the blood
is so short that, if the mother stops taking her vitamin D supplement
for a day or two, vitamin D in her milk will be low (or absent
altogether) on the days she skips."
---------------------------
Adding Nuts to Your Diet May Help You Live Longer
By Dr. Mercola
Raw organic nuts make for a near-ideal snack given their healthy
fat, vitamin, antioxidant, and fiber content. If you’ve avoided them out
of concern for your weight, you may want to reconsider.
A growing number of studies refute the myth that nuts might cause
weight gain. In fact, the converse is true, as research1 shows weight
loss is one of the health benefits of regular nut consumption.
Those who eat nuts on a regular basis also tend to have lower
systolic blood pressure and are less likely to have risk factors for
metabolic syndrome, such as low HDL cholesterol, abdominal obesity, and
high fasting glucose.
It’s not surprising then that nut consumption has been linked to
cardiovascular health and a lower risk for diabetes. A number of studies
have also linked nuts to a reduced mortality risk and life extension.
One reason nuts are so beneficial is that many—including walnuts,
hazelnuts, pecans, Brazil nuts, and almonds—contain the amino acid l-arginine,
which offers multiple vascular benefits to people with heart disease, or
those who have increased risk for heart disease due to multiple cardiac
risk factors.
Adding Nuts May Help You Live Longer
One large-scale, 30-year long Harvard study found that people who
ate a small handful (approximately one ounce or 28 grams) of nuts seven
times per week or more were 20 percent less likely to die for any
reason, compared to those who avoided nuts.
As reported by the Washington Post:
“Even those who ate nuts less than once a week had a seven
percent reduction in risk. Consuming nuts at least five times a week
corresponded to a 29 percent drop in mortality risk for heart disease, a
24 percent decline for respiratory disease and an 11 percent drop for
cancer.”
Another study published in the Annals of Internal Medicine found
that middle-aged women who followed a Mediterranean-style diet rich in
nuts and vegetables were approximately 40 percent more likely to survive
into later decades without developing some form of chronic
disease—including age-related memory deterioration.
Most recently, researchers at Maastricht University investigated the
link between specific nuts and diseases, and found that those who ate at
least 10 grams (0.3 ounces) of nuts or peanuts a day had an average 23
percent reduced risk of death due to cancer, diabetes, respiratory- and
neurodegenerative diseases during the decade-long study.
More specifically, nut eaters lowered their risk for:
Neurodegenerative disease by 45 percent
Respiratory disease by 39 percent
Diabetes by 30 percent
Read the rest of the article
---------------------------
From Dr.
James Bogash
http://lifecarechiropractic.com/blog/nsaids-deaths/
ARE YOU AWARE THAT THIS COMMON CLASS OF DRUGS KILLS 21,000 PEOPLE PER YEAR?
Almost everyone is surprised about the annual number of deaths that
occur due to the Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs (like
ibuprofen). This number, in light of the increased risk of NSAIDs on
the heart that came to light because of the Vioxx trials, is likely
much, much higher. Most deaths from this class of drugs are from
bleeding ulcers. I’m not even sure we’re counting the cardiovascular
deaths.
This particular study illuminates why these numbers may be so high.
Researchers looked at patients who were given prescriptions for an
NSAID. Of these, 86.6% were at increased GI risk and 72.7% for heart
disease. The patients’ individual risk had no bearing on getting the
prescription.
Wow. I always find this in stark contrast to the opinion that
chiropractic care is “unsafe” or someone doesn’t “believe” in
chiropractic care (didn’t know it was a religion…). Instead of a
referral to a chiropractor, many PCPs will give a prescription for
NSAIDs, unaware of the high risks associated with this class of drugs.
Think of this next time you crack open that bottle of ibuprofen for your
headache…
Read more
---------------------------
Bed Rest for Your Back Pain? Not the Best Idea
http://www.toyourhealth.com/mpacms/tyh/article.php?id=1751
Upwards of 80 percent of adults suffer at least one episode of back pain
in their lifetime, which means you've already felt the pain, are feeling
it now or will feel it before you know it.
And chances are good that, like so many others, your first thought will
be to get off your feet, lie down and rest. Unfortunately, evidence
suggests that unless the pain is severe or accompanied by other
symptoms, such as pain radiating down the legs, rest is exactly the
opposite strategy if you're trying to relieve your back pain.
If you're suffering from back pain, staying active is an important piece
of advice to follow in the majority of cases. That means avoiding bed
rest, prolonged stretches of sitting, standing or inactivity; and doing
all the things you usually do, within reason (no heavy lifting or
intense physical activity, including twisting or other dramatic
movements that could make the pain worse).
While it may sound counterintuitive, abundant research suggests activity
can help reduce the pain and shorten recovery time in most cases of
noncomplicated back pain. In fact, one study that summarized findings
from an international task force on back pain stated, among other
findings / recommendations: 1) bed rest is contraindicated in subacute
and chronic cases of low back pain; in acute cases, bed rest should
neither be enforced nor prescribed; and if authorized (based on pain
indication), bed rest should be for the shortest duration possible.
The theory is relatively simple, if you think about it: Inactivity can
make your spine and back muscles tight and stiff, increasing the pain,
particularly when you bend or stretch. Prolonged inactivity can also
make you weaker, not to mention that evidence suggests the longer you
stay in bed with pain, the more likely that your pain will become
chronic / more disabling, often because you avoid moving for fear it
will exacerbate the pain.
Of course, the first step when suffering back pain is to make a visit
with a health care provider who can evaluate your pain, make sure
there's nothing more serious going on, and then offer treatment and
self-care recommendations (including activity) to help relieve it. Enter
your doctor of chiropractic, the experts in treating spinal pain.